Is it time to rename Reference?

What is the Library Reference desk anymore? I’ve been working reference for a good amount of time (in relation to my own short time, and probably a pittance in the views of old school reference librarians), and I have never been asked what might be called a true “reference” question, such as what’s the capital of Zimbabwe? Or who won last year’s world series? Or whatever, I’m not even sure what such a question is anymore. Obviously people get this information from the internet. In days gone by reference librarians sat behind the desk guardians of mundane facts furiously checking almanacs and phone books and encyclopedias. These “ready reference” shelves still exist in many libraries, collecting dust mostly, I honestly can’t remember if I’ve ever looked in an almanac. Perhaps when I was little and playing Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego, and you had to look up facts in a little book that came with the game.

Butler ReferenceIn my opinion the reference desk has changed for the better. The world of information has exploded, but is harder to navigate than ever before. At Columbia that have 1300 (!) databases, most of which are impossible to find when you need them. They have ten million books plus e-books searchable in their catalog. The reference desk is there to help confused, despondent, panicking students navigate. The reference desk provides research assistance and slyly throws in library use instruction. It’s an important job, but it’s really not the same thing at all as “Reference” is it?

So the library has moved on, but yet you still read articles on how wikipedia has supplanted libraries. But that’s only if they are competing, and if anyone thinks a library can compete with the internet for “reference” they are probably still living in 1960 in their mind. But why then do we still call it reference when that’s not at all what we do anymore, and when it gives people the idea that it’s outdated and unnecessary, contributing to the death spiral of reduced use leading to reduced hours. I haven’t the faintest clue what it should be called … the Let us help you, please! desk or something. But the term has stuck around in Library Lingo and probably isn’t going anywhere, so maybe instead we need to get the word out that reference means something new now, something awesome and useful, and completely different from the kind of information than you find on wikipedia. The word reference already has about 300 meanings anyways, what’s one more?

Tagged , ,

2 thoughts on “Is it time to rename Reference?

  1. rcorrell says:

    I very much agree with your ideas about reference being an outdated word to use when referring to that physical desk in the library. I think that some libraries use the sign “Information Desk,” but in some ways, unfortunately, I find this label too broad and ambiguous. Perhaps there is a happy medium out there. I like your “Let us help you, please! desk” and as a more concise version of it, the “Helpful Desk.” However, that might bring up a whole new discussion as to how helpful librarians really are.

  2. Alex Watkins says:

    My most practical idea is Research Assistance, but of course that seems so boring, where’s the excitement?
    And on the topic of helpful librarians. They can be extremely helpful, awesome, superheroes (I think). But don’t get me started on the bad librarians out there that give our profession a bad name. Perhaps they are good librarians that shouldn’t be let within 50 feet of a “reference” desk, and are better suited to technical services…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 115 other followers

%d bloggers like this: